Questions on the adoption of children in homosexual couples

ACTIVITY #1

ARGUMENTS IN CON:

Objetive: safeguard the welfare of children.

1) Have a develop in a natural family, father and mother, WHY? 

The roles are complementary to train them and educate them in a correct way.

2) Children are not objects to satisfy the desires of affection of these couples.

3) A very point to emphasize is violence in homosexual couples.

Studies in carried out by the gay community in the united states and university of  SAN FRANCISCO agree that the 79% of homosexual couples suffer from physical abuse coming to the end memory loss, broken bones, etc; which brings us to the question...  

Really are capable of taking care of physical and mental health of a child?

4) 

• Really know what kids say about having a dad and a mom? A young man of 17 years adopted by a homosexual couple gives a speech to fight against "marriage for all" in the expressed the following: "We need to put it plainly, an orphan needs to dad and mom.
  In contrast, the couple wants a child, and between "need" and "want", there is a lot of difference." We are not here to comfort you by not having children! We are not a prize! We are not a right! Don't talk as if you had the right to us. This is violating our identity!

ACTIVITY #2

Questions in pro 

How would you feel if your child were gay?
I would feel confused because it would have the doubt if I contributed to that happen.

What do you think about gay people?
Who are brave because they dare to be different.

Why think homosexual people can not teach values?

If you can but it would not be a proper moral education in my opinion do not teach in a correct way.

Questions in con 

What kind of education would homosexuals give the child?
An incomplete education because the homosexual couple cannot provide the model of father and mother needed for the normal psychological development of the child.

What it homophobic?
It is the rejection to homosexuals people.

Why confuse religion with homophobic?
Because some people think that religion obliges to reject and think badly about homosexuals.

Why are you pro?
Because I have to be tolerant and respect all.

CON TEAM - HOMOSEXUAL FAMILY 

SOURCE #1:

https://youtu.be/2Rdo17ub1Ak

FACTS: 

1) Abuse  sexual to a Children 

2) It  creates more gays 

3)It destroys mariages 

4) Divorce will be easier 

5) It leads to polygamy 

6) God hates fags 

SOURCE #2:

https://youtu.be/ZJX6pm1CCEM

FACTS:

1)In this link say: "The childrens are not objects to satisfy the desires of affection of these couples 

2) Have develop in a natural family, father and mother 

3) The homosexual couples don't needed adopt childrens.

SOURCE #3:

https://youtu.be/tP9VnQbEIh4

FACTS:

1) In the video the psychologist gives us the message that a person can do what you want in your life, as long as It does not cause harm to others ( that would be what you would do to child unconciously).

ACTIVITY #4:

QUESTIONS OF ARGUMENTS IN CON OF MARRIAGE HOMOSEXUAL WITHOUT RELIGION

Link: https://youtu.be/kmg4cvI2WkQ

1) ¿NO ES COMÚN LA CONDUCTA HMOSEXUAL EN LOS ANIMALES? 

Investigaciones muestran que la conducta homosexual en el reino animal a evolucionado mucho y que ahora es común en muchas especies.

2)¿No crees que ellos también tienen derecho al matrimonio? 

En mi opinión respeto que tengan el derecho a tener matrimonio, todo está bien siempre y cuando respetemos los derechos ajenos y no perjudique a terceras personas.

3) ¿Podria  considerarse el homosexualismo una variante social de lo natural?

Se consideraría más como una desviación de lo natural.

4) ¿No crees que la sociedad homosexual sufre mucha marginación homofobica?

No, porque hoy en día mucha gente decide abrir su mente y aceptar el hecho de que existen cada vez más personas homosexuales.

5) ¿Por qué comprarse el homosexualismo con la pedofilia y el canibalismo? 

Porque son cosas que no son comunes o más bien digamos "no son correctas" pero las personas puede que terminen apoyando este tipo de acciones.

Con the adoption by homosexuals couples

 ARGUMENTS IN CON:

Objetive: safeguard the welfare of children.

1) Have a develop in a natural family, father and mother, WHY? 

The roles are complementary to train them and educate them in a correct way.

2) Children are not objects to satisfy the desires of affection of these couples.

 

3) A very point to emphasize is violence in homosexual couples.

Studies in carried out by the gay community in the united states and university of  SAN FRANCISCO agree that the 79% of homosexual couples suffer from physical abuse coming to the end memory loss, broken bones, etc; which brings us to the question...  

Really are capable of taking care of physical and mental health of a child?

4) 

• Really know what kids say about having a dad and a mom? A young man of 17 years adopted by a homosexual couple gives a speech to fight against "marriage for all" in the expressed the following: "We need to put it plainly, an orphan needs to dad and mom.
  In contrast, the couple wants a child, and between "need" and "want", there is a lot of difference." We are not here to comfort you by not having children! We are not a prize! We are not a right! Don't talk as if you had the right to us. This is violating our identity!