Con the adoption by homosexuals couples

 ARGUMENTS IN CON:

Objetive: safeguard the welfare of children.

1) Have a develop in a natural family, father and mother, WHY? 

The roles are complementary to train them and educate them in a correct way.

2) Children are not objects to satisfy the desires of affection of these couples.

 

3) A very point to emphasize is violence in homosexual couples.

Studies in carried out by the gay community in the united states and university of  SAN FRANCISCO agree that the 79% of homosexual couples suffer from physical abuse coming to the end memory loss, broken bones, etc; which brings us to the question...  

Really are capable of taking care of physical and mental health of a child?

4) 

• Really know what kids say about having a dad and a mom? A young man of 17 years adopted by a homosexual couple gives a speech to fight against "marriage for all" in the expressed the following: "We need to put it plainly, an orphan needs to dad and mom.
  In contrast, the couple wants a child, and between "need" and "want", there is a lot of difference." We are not here to comfort you by not having children! We are not a prize! We are not a right! Don't talk as if you had the right to us. This is violating our identity!